"These men, largely private, were functioning on a level different from the foreign policy of the United States, and years later when New York Times reporter Neil Sheehan read through the entire documentary history of the war, that history known as the Pentagon Papers, he would come away with one impression above all, which was that the government of the United States was not what he had thought it was; it was as if there were an inner U.S. government, what he called 'a centralized state, far more powerful than anything else, for whom the enemy is not simply the Communists but everything else, its own press, its own judiciary, its own Congress, foreign and friendly governments - all these are potentially antagonistic. It had survived and perpetuated itself,' Sheehan continued, 'often using the issue of anti-Communism as a weapon against the other branches of government and the press, and finally, it does not function necessarily for the benefit of the Republic but rather for its own ends, its own perpetuation; it has its own codes which are quite different from public codes. Secrecy was a way of protecting itself, not so much from threats by foreign governments but from detection from its own population on charges of its own competence and wisdom.' Each succeeding Administration, Sheehan noted, was careful, once in office, not to expose the weaknesses of its predecessor. After all, essentially the same people were running the governments, they had continuity to each other, and each succeeding Administration found itself faced with virtually the same enemies. Thus the national security apparatus kept its continuity, and every outgoing President tended to rally to the side of the incumbent President."Out of this of course came a willingness to use covert operations; it was a necessity of the times, to match the Communists, and what your own population and your own Congress did not know was not particularly important; it was almost better if they did not know..."David Halberstam
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Screeching like Goebbels
A lot of noise has been heard about how crazy Trump is and how Hillary Clinton is the civilized person's only choice.
There is nothing civilized about Hillary Clinton, any more than there is about Barack Obama. They make all the right noises and probably somewhere their hearts are in the right place. But like Lyndon Johnson before them - a guy who wanted to be a genuinely healing American president on domestic reform - they crashed and burned on foreign policy.
There is a lot of evidence about this.
The fact is that as far as most of the rest of the world is concerned - particularly that world that was called the Third World and now euphemistically the Developing World - Trump is the accurate face of American foreign policy.
Clinton represents, as did Obama, Business As Usual. The forces they represent are not reasonable, not civilized, and not interested in the Nuremberg Principles. It is entirely possible that neither Clinton nor Obama has read the Nuremberg Principles. These forces are in fact unprincipled, lawless, selfish, and vicious.
Trump's face is the honest one. Clinton's is a lie.
Thursday, June 23, 2016
Dishonoured Legacy Part 2
Burying the Afghanistan Inquiry
![]() |
| Entire report is here. |
- Preface, Dishonoured Legacy,
“We can only hope that Somalia represents the nadir of the fortunes of the Canadian Forces. There seems to be little room to slide lower. One thing is certain, however: left uncorrected, the problems that surfaced in the desert in Somalia and in the boardrooms at National Defence Headquarters will continue to spawn military ignominy. The victim will be Canada and its international reputation.”
The Report of The Commission of Inquiry into the Deployment of Canadian forces in Afghanistan
"So I said, you know, the NDS tortures people, that is what they do, and if we don’t want to have detainees tortured, we shouldn’t give them to the NDS."
– Richard Colvin, testimony before the Canadian Military Police Complaints Commission, April 13, 2010
"Canada is proud of the honourable work of the men and women in uniform and civilian officials who served in Afghanistan. Canada remains the leading donor supporting the work of the AIHRC to strengthen its capacity to fulfill its constitutional mandate to monitor human rights in Afghanistan. Throughout Canada’s military operations in Afghanistan, the Government of Canada ensured individuals detained by the CAF were treated humanely and handled, transferred or released in accordance with our obligations under international law. Therefore the Government of Canada does not believe an independent judicial commission of inquiry is necessary."- Harjit Sajjan, Minister of National Defence, response to petition 421-00217 (for an inquiry) June 16, 2016
Thursday, June 16, 2016
Two solitudes? In Quebec, leading media (La Presse and L'Actualite) talking about need for public inquiry. https://t.co/LDYFgrf9I5 In ROC? 0
— Craig Scott (@CraigScottNDP) June 16, 2016
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Letter to PM Trudeau signed by Joe Clark, Ed Broadbent, former Cdn diplomats calling for inquiry on #Afghan torture https://t.co/iibYCE8w81— Craig Scott (@CraigScottNDP) June 8, 2016
Monday, February 15, 2016
NATO and The Incredible Stupidity of Being
A film playing 24/7 everywhere.
In the spirit of The Emperor Has No Clothes it's worth pointing out the obvious: NATO doesn't have any either.
In the current hand wringing over gun violence in the world, it's worth pointing out that after all this hand wringing, NATO tries to solve all political problems with guns. And there's bombing of course (including cluster bombs already forbidden by The Ottawa Treaty, except for the USA who didn't sign it), rocketing of hospitals clearly marked and identified (war crimes as identified in the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Geneva IV, Article 14) even if some were done by proxy.
And it's worth pointing out that NATO sees no obvious connection between violence it has perpetrated (I'm not saying started) in the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia, and the "refugee crisis" now imposing its fully clothed (if occasionally dead) reality on...NATO that is earnestly guarding against it.
The fact that Russia does bad things is irrelevant.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is stupidity at its most elemental level: the denial of a reality verifiable by a child, and a crime verifiable by anyone who can read.
And Canada is part of it.
Sunday, February 14, 2016
Valentines for the Planet
Being in space you realise what matters most on Earth: look after each other & the planet https://t.co/6ONemF7fGchttps://t.co/GRijUDXlUv
— Tim Peake (@astro_timpeake) February 14, 2016
Edgar Mitchell of Apollo 14 & 6th man to walk on the moon has died today. R.I.P Ed. 👊😕👍 pic.twitter.com/XxQbOdDeJi
— tim cornwell (@247razz) February 6, 2016
Thursday, January 7, 2016
When you think the world's going to hell, this'll help
Tanguy de Lamotte, "Smoke on the Water" (extended version)
"Air guitar sur "Smoke on the water" de Deep Purple à 45 noeuds de vent ça fume pour Tanguy de Lamotte sur Initiatives Coeur durant son Vendée Globe 2012."
And he's back.
Vendee Globe, 2016
Saturday, January 2, 2016
The Hunting of the Snarf (système national pour un autre référendum franglais*)
![]() |
They sought it with thimbles, they sought its great mission;
They pursued it with forks and hope;
They threatened its life with a Royal Commission;
They charmed it with smiles and soap.
"Just the place for a Snarf!" the Prime Minister cried,
As he landed his crew with care;
And supported them all on the strength of his bride
With her fingers that gripped his great hair.
"Just the place for a Snarf! I have said it twice:
That alone should encourage the crew.
Just the place for a Snarf! I have said it thrice:
What I tell you three times is true."
The crew was complete: it included a Sikh—
A man who was expert on 'Hoods—
A Barrister, brought in to arrange their first nations—
To make treaties and guilt understood.
The Prime Minister said as he stood in his bed:
"Our Snarf-hunt must have a Commission,
To see promises kept and not furtively swept,
Beneath carpets of Sins of Omission."
But none was too sure what the promises were,
To their consternatèd recollection,
Until they recalled Rideau Hall in the fall,
'Twas to form a new means of election.
A new-found Rainmaker, whose skill was immense,
Might have influenced more than his share—
But a Banker, engaged at enormous expense,
Had the whole of their cash in his care.
There was also a Beaver, who paced on the deck
And gnawed parts of the wheel for a dam,
That installed on the prow, often saved them from wreck,
Though none of the crew could say how.
There was one who was famed for the number of things
She forgot when she entered the ship:
Her corporate history, her pipelines of mystery,
And the ethics she’d bought for the trip.
She had forty two ethics, all carefully packed,
With her name painted clearly on each:
But, since she omitted to mention the fact,
They were all left behind on the beach.
There were more crew besides but the time and the tides
Propelled Snarf-hunting right to the fore,
Which was trapped by the dam that the Beaver had planned
So they left it and met on the shore.
The Prime Minister said as he stood in his bed:
"Our Snarf-hunt must have a Commission,
To see promises kept and not furtively swept,
Beneath carpets of Sins of Omission."
But none was too sure what the promises were,
To their consternatèd recollection,
Until they recalled Rideau Hall in the fall,
'Twas to form a new means of election.
The Commissioners each formed a different view
Well before terms of reference were read,
And they all spoke at once so that none of them knew
One word that the others had said.
They considered the means, the whys, whens, and wherefores
To be newly and fairly elected,
And the means of Australia, New Zealand, and France,
And Great Britain among those selected.
Australia, some cried with particular pride,
Has national mandatory voting.
And a Senate elected (thus appointments rejected),
And gun control laws without gloating.
But New Zealand others said, Mixed Member Prop Rep!
More than 90 per cent turnout also!
But unfortunately they had elected John Key,
An NSA lick-spittle bozo.
"But what do we say of the U.S.of A?"
The Barrister asked in confusion.
"They are neighbours of ours, they have very good bars
And a famously good Constitution."
"Yes, the writing is grand" said the Beaver whose hands
Were unrolling the said Constitution.
"But as George Carlin said, it's unfortunately dead,
And embalmed in the Smithsoniootion"
"We can do no other than consider the Mother
Of All Parliaments!" the PM declared.
"It used to be good," said the Sikh in the 'Hood,
"But then it coughed up Tony Blair."
The discussion went on, and further and further
Through one hundred and ninety-three nations,
And though each sometimes pleasey, could be just as sleazy
So concluded in futiliation.
The French were too boozy, the Italians too floozy,
The Dutch and the Germans too rigid,
The Indians too Chinese, the Chinese too Indian,
And Scandinavians of course far too frigid.
*NotSorry
The Barrister asked in confusion.
"They are neighbours of ours, they have very good bars
And a famously good Constitution."
"Yes, the writing is grand" said the Beaver whose hands
Were unrolling the said Constitution.
"But as George Carlin said, it's unfortunately dead,
And embalmed in the Smithsoniootion"
"We can do no other than consider the Mother
Of All Parliaments!" the PM declared.
"It used to be good," said the Sikh in the 'Hood,
"But then it coughed up Tony Blair."
There were those who thought that a Snarf might be sought
Through Proportional Representation.
But the example they gave (it was Israel) so grave
‘Twas rejected without hesitation.
The discussion went on, and further and further
Through one hundred and ninety-three nations,
And though each sometimes pleasey, could be just as sleazy
So concluded in futiliation.
The French were too boozy, the Italians too floozy,
The Dutch and the Germans too rigid,
The Indians too Chinese, the Chinese too Indian,
And Scandinavians of course far too frigid.
They sought it with symbols, they sought through thin air;
They pursued it with storks and dope;
They threatened its life with a Terrorist Scare;
They charmed it with smiles and soap.
They shuddered to think that the chase might fail,
And the Beaver, excited at last,
Went bounding along on the tip of its tail,
For the daylight was nearly past.
"There's Wassername laughing!" the Prime Minister cried,
"She was laughing like mad till she barfed!"
He looked all around then adjusted his gown,
"She certainly has found a Snarf!"
They gazed in delight, while the Barrister exclaimed
"She was always a doubtful appointment."
She was up to her neck—their Heroine unnamed—
In Unethical Swamped Disappointment.
In Unethical Swamped Disappointment.
Erect and sublime, for one moment of time,
In the next, that wild figure they saw
Sank more in the soup to submerge with a "floop"
While they waited and listened in awe.
"It's a Snarf!" was the sound that first came to
their ears,
And seemed surely a relief that it be.
Then followed a torrent of laughter and cheers:
Then the ominous words "It's a Key—"
Then, silence. Some fancied they heard in the air
A weary and wandering sigh,
That sounded like "—stone!" but the others declared
It was only a breeze that went by.
They hunted till darkness came on, but they found
Not a button, or feather, or scarf,
By which they could tell that they stood on the ground
Where Wassername met with the Snarf.
In the midst of the word she was trying to say,
In the midst of her laughter and glee,
She had softly and suddenly vanished away—
For the Snarf was a Keystone, you see.*NotSorry
Friday, January 1, 2016
"And yes, there is hope. I think ordinary common sense suffices - no special training, like my uncle - to unravel this and see what's really happening."
"I don't think it's hard to discover that the U.S. is a leading terrorist state. It's obvious."
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
UN Security Council Resolution 2254 - a diplomatic clusterfuck
George Orwell, Politics and the English Language"Modern English, especially written English, is full of bad habits which spread by imitation and which can be avoided if one is willing to take the necessary trouble. If one gets rid of these habits one can think more clearly, and to think clearly is a necessary first step towards political regeneration: so that the fight against bad English is not frivolous and is not the exclusive concern of professional writers."
There is an industry - known by many names but "strategic communication" is one - whose goal is to convince people that pigs fly. This disease has infected the Security Council.
Self-evident matters of fact and law:
1. Neither this resolution (2254) nor resolution 2249 authorizes military action under Chapter VII of the UN Charter.
2. The proposition that Canada's current military involvement in Syria is in any way "self defence" is ludicrous.
3. There is no other circumstance that use of military force by one nation state in the territory of another is lawful under the Charter.
War on Terror, explained (via Mark MacKinnon)
Man accidentally comes up with perfect metaphor for 14 years of the "War On Terror." https://t.co/UHAES3twc1
— Mark MacKinnon (@markmackinnon) October 14, 2015
Man tries to put out garbage fire by driving over it in a van loaded with ammunition: http://t.co/EZ73JB1r18 pic.twitter.com/SFdB9csm72
— The Kansas City Star (@KCStar) October 14, 2015
Monday, December 7, 2015
Friday, December 4, 2015
"The Mission" and UN Security Council Resolution 2249
What mission?
Resolution 2249 conspicuously avoided authorizing any military action under Article 51 of the Charter (or any other part of Chapter VII) but spelled out the body of international law "particularly the Charter" that must be observed.
Article 2(7) says
- Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.
Enforcement measures under Chapter VII are not authorized by 2249. But it calls for "all necessary means" to "eradicate" the safe haven for terrorists in Iraq and Syria.
This is a resolution of weasel words. It calls on members to eradicate terrorists without, once again, giving a clear statement of what terrorism is, except that "terrorists" are people who are then placed on the "1267 committee" terrorism list, an opaque process. So we have circular arguments about who the terrorists are, and contradictory instructions and permissions to member nations who have the capacity to do the unspecified eradication. "All necessary means" presumably does not include nuclear weapons.
A plain reading of the UN Charter seems to make clear that participation in civil wars is forbidden. Whatever is going on in Syria and Iraq is civil war. If the UN Security Council wants something enforced, it should say so and give authorization for military action. Otherwise, shut up.
In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible. Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square with the professed aims of political parties. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. Defenseless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets: this is called PACIFICATION. Millions of peasants are robbed of their farms and sent trudging along the roads with no more than they can carry: this is called TRANSFER OF POPULATION or RECTIFICATION OF FRONTIERS. People are imprisoned for years without trial, or shot in the back of the neck or sent to die of scurvy in Arctic lumber camps: this is called ELIMINATION OF UNRELIABLE ELEMENTS. Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them.
Orwell, Politics and the English Language
Friday, November 27, 2015
Low tech national security
2. Speak the language
3. Listen to the people who live there
All he heard from his generals President Johnson said was “Bomb, bomb, bomb. That’s all you know. Well, I want to know why there’s nothing else. You generals have all been educated at the taxpayers’ expense, and you’re not giving me any ideas and any solutions for this damn little piss-ant country. Now, I don’t need ten generals to come in here ten times and tell me to bomb, I want some solutions, I want some answers.”
David Halberstam
The Best and the Brightest
Military people can always rationalize almost any problem's becoming military and thus susceptible to a military solution. They dislike interference on the part of the State Department when that Department sees serious political consequences stemming from the use of military force.
James Gavin
On to Berlin
Then we dropped, hovered, settled down into the purple lz smoke, dozens of children broke from their hootches to run in toward the focus of the landing, the pilot laughing and saying, "Vietnam, man. Bomb 'em and feed 'em, bomb 'em and feed 'em."
Michael Herr
Dispatches
Monday, November 23, 2015
Fear and loathing of Islam
#SteveJobs father #AbdulfattahJandali was born & grew up in #Syria before joining #refugees #Startup & #FastForward pic.twitter.com/5VZthWPf7c
— Alessandro AE Anzani (@AleAeAnzani) November 17, 2015
Saturday, November 21, 2015
Sanity and more sanity
Four days on the trail of terror: The problem isn’t as simple as defeating Islamic State https://t.co/Q3jX8nJcdw pic.twitter.com/2HqHSLFu3h
— The Globe and Mail (@globeandmail) November 21, 2015
— Charles Glass (@CGlassArticles) November 19, 2015
Monday, November 16, 2015
Little Boys, Big Toys, Fools
"We see the United States as deeply worried about terrorism. But effectively fighting against terrorism does not mean increasing the number of military operations; it means fighting against what causes terrorism. If you introduce kindness and gentleness at the place where terrorism begins, you will eradicate terrorism without pain. It is necessary to examine the most sensitive areas of the earth. You can do nothing to stop the seventeen-year-old kid who has decided to place a bomb somewhere. You can do strictly nothing, and any effort against him will just fly back in your face. Countering violence with violence is the most ineffective response imaginable. Instead, we should target the pain, with the goal to alleviate it. I firmly desire a worldwide dialogue, and I would like to see the United States discharged from the monologue. The period of great wars is over. Science has put in the hands of children extraordinary means of death. The greatest error the United States is currently making is to think that international military operations can stop a seventeen-year-old child from acting. The focus should be placed instead on alleviating the pain in the most sensitive regions of the world, beginning with Jerusalem."
Excerpt from “Déchiffrer le silence”:
A Conversation with Germaine Tillion
by Alison Rice
Sunday, November 15, 2015
Friday, November 13, 2015
A perspective on Paris
"Iraqcivcas" by Hannah Fischer, Information Research Specialist- Knowledge Services Group - en:Congressional Research Service. Licensed under Public Domain via Commons.
What happened last night in Paris was an average night in Iraq for about 2 years.
Those two years were part of a hideous tapestry of violence that began with the American invasion of 2003 and isn't over yet. That's just Iraq.
Afghanistan - quasi-legal invasion and incompetent occupation by white Christian armies
Libya - quasi-legal bombing campaign (begun with some really adolescent enthusiasm by France and subsequently conducted by rogue elements in NATO) that resulted in anarchy and destruction of society, which is apparently of interest to nobody, including France
Syria - Oh, God
Mali - see Libya
Egypt - it's so nice to have our vicious autocratic kleptocracy back on our side
Palestine and the occupied territories - "sorry?"
Last night in Paris didn't come out of nowhere. There's more than one monster rampaging in the Middle East.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








