Saturday, April 30, 2011

Winston Churchill, Parliamentary Democracy, and Steve

"The Prime Minister is the servant of the House and is liable to dismissal at a moment's notice by a simple vote."


Photo Karsh December 1941

Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons Official Report, Jan. 27, 1942.

THE PRIME MINISTER (MR. CHURCHILL):

From time to time in the life of any Government there come occasions which must be clarified. No one who has read the newspapers of the last few weeks about our affairs at home and abroad can doubt that such an occasion is at hand.

Since my return to this country, I have come to the conclusion that I must ask to be sustained by a Vote of Confidence from the House of Commons. This is a thoroughly normal, constitutional, democratic procedure. A Debate on the war has been asked for. I have arranged it in the fullest and freest manner for three whole days. Any Member will be free to say anything he thinks fit about or against the Administration or against the composition or personalities of the Government, to his heart's content, subject only to the reservation, which the House is always so careful to observe about military secrets. Could you have anything freer than that? Could you have any higher expression of democracy than that? Very few other countries have institutions strong enough to sustain such a thing while they are fighting for their lives.

I owe it to the House to explain to them what has led me to ask for their exceptional support at this time. It has been suggested that we should have a three days' Debate of this kind in which the Government would no doubt be lustily belaboured by some of those who have lighter burdens to carry, and that at the end we should separate without a Division. In this case sections of the Press which are hostile-and there are some whose hostility is pronounced-could declare that the Government's credit was broken, and, it might even be hinted, after all that has passed and all the discussion there has been, that it had been privately intimated to me that I should be very reckless if I asked for a Vote of Confidence from Parliament.

And the matter does not stop there. It must be remembered that these reports can then be flashed all over the world, and that they are repeated in enemy broadcasts night after night in order to show that the Prime Minister has no right to speak for the nation and that the Government in Britain is about to collapse. Anyone who listens to the fulminations which come from across the water know that that is no exaggeration. Of course, these statements from foreign sources would not be true, but neither would it be helpful to anyone that there should be any doubt about our position.

There is another aspect. We in this Island for a long time were alone, holding aloft the torch. We are no longer alone now. We are now at the centre and among those at the summit of 26 United Nations, comprising more than three-quarters of the population of the globe. Whoever speaks for Britain at this moment must be known to speak, not only in the name of the people-and of that I feel pretty sure I may-but in the name of Parliament and, above all, of the House of Commons. It is genuine public interest that requires that these facts should be made manifest afresh in a formal way.

PRIME MINISTER WINSTON CHURCHILL ADDRESSED THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IN A REVIEW OF THE WAR
September 8, 1942

Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons Official Report.

WAR SITUATION
THE PRIME MINISTER (MR. CHURCHILL): Nine weeks have passed since I spoke here on the Vote of Censure. I am most grateful to the House for the substantial majority which they then gave to me and to the Government. Every proof that is given to the world of the inflexible steadfastness of Parliament and of its sense of proportion strengthens the British war effort in a definite and recognisable manner. Most particularly are such manifestations of our national will-power a help to the head of the British Government in time of war. The Prime Minister of the day, as head of the Executive, has to be from time to time in contact and correspondence with the Heads of the Executives of the great Allied States. President Roosevelt and Premier Stalin are not only Heads of the Executive but are Commanders-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. We work our affairs in a different way. The Prime Minister is the servant of the House and is liable to dismissal at a moment's notice by a simple vote. It is only possible for him to do what is necessary, and what has got to be done on occasion by somebody or other, if he enjoys, as I do, the support of an absolutely loyal and united Cabinet, and if he is refreshed and fortified from time to time, and especially in bad times, as I have been, by massive and overwhelming Parliamentary majorities. Then your servant is able to transact the important business which has to be done with confidence and freedom, and is able to meet people at the heads of the Allied countries on more or less equal terms and on occasion to say, "Yes" and "No," without delay upon some difficult questions. Thus we arrive, by our ancient constitutional methods, at practical working arrangements which show that Parliamentary democracy can adapt itself to all situations and can go out in all weathers. That is why I am especially grateful to the House for their unswerving support and for the large majority with which they rejected a hostile vote on the last occasion we were together.

The Harper Song (Steve It's Time to Leave)
by John Roby

Friday, April 29, 2011

The Very Seriously Unwell Knell of The Globe and Mail



I'm not saying it's terminal, but it's very worrying.

Canada's "national newspaper" published - presumably after considerable thought - an editorial endorsing Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada in the current Federal Election, an editorial that managed to avoid the entire reason for the election in the first place: contempt of Parliament and the abuse of power.

There seems to be a pattern of great newspapers going broke and caving to crass political pressure. Consider for example the New York Times that continues to publish Wikileaks documents while simultaneously portraying them as not that important, the leaker of said documents as being an unprincipled sex maniac, and the source - who clearly thought he was upholding his oath to the American Constitution - a traitor.

You can't have it both ways. Either you're interested in the truth or you're willing to look the other way, just like the Germans who affected not to notice the concentration camps. Of course, there's a price for speaking the truth, as Bradley Manning is allegedly discovering, but one that the owners of The Globe, The New York Times, the Washington Post, and The Times (of London of course, there is no other) are anxious to avoid. Even The Guardian, supported by a trust, managed to screw up the WikiLeaks bonanza, to the extent of excluding the CBC in some misguided apprehension of exclusivity. Look where that got them. There must be some German word that combines "hubris" and "stupidity".

Even over the last 10 years, The Globe has published fabulous stuff - like Graeme Smith in Kandahar who was clearly not "embedded" and spoke the truth. It's as if the Globe Editorial Board lives in its own bubble universe, and doesn't read its own newspaper. Actually, that's very much like The Wall Street Journal, even before Murdoch bought it.

It's time for loyal Canadian citizens to save The Globe and Mail from eating its own young.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Loose elephant in Globe and Mail Editorial Boardroom

The subject who is truly loyal to the chief magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures - Junius
From Thursday's Globe and Mail
Apr. 28, 2011 Page A14

Globe Editorial
The Globe’s election endorsement: Facing up to our challenges
From Thursday's Globe and Mail
Apr. 28, 2011 Page A14

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

House of Commons Night in Canada 2011.1



RON MACLEAN
So it's me, Ron MacLean, here with Don Cherry on House of Commons Night in Canada. Don, we're into the home stretch, and there's unprecedented interest in the final. What's your take on that?

DON CHERRY
I still think Luongo's out to kill me...

RON MACLEAN
You were saying that last year.

DON CHERRY
...and I'm trying not to take it personally.

RON MACLEAN
That would be Roberto Luongo of the Vancouver Canucks...

DON CHERRY
Is there another Luongo?

RON MACLEAN
Yeah, his dad, but what we're talking about is the Canadian Federal Election on May 2, 2011

DON CHERRY
Luongo's dad must be superhuman, in an asylum, or dead. I can't imagine a normal human being surviving the last two years of Canadian hockey if his kid was Canada's clutch goaltender.

RON MACLEAN
The fact remains that Roberto Luongo isn't running for Parliament in the election...

DON CHERRY
He doesn't have time.

RON MACLEAN
...but other people are, and in particular Jack Layton who's making an underdog playoff push.

DON CHERRY
Who said Layton was an underdog? I like his guts, and his suits are better than all the other guys.

RON MACLEAN
What about Elizabeth May?

DON CHERRY
What about her? She doesn't wear suits.

RON MACLEAN
How would you know?

DON CHERRY
Fair comment. I've never seen her wearing a suit.

RON MACLEAN
And you've never seen Jack Layton in his underwear.

DON CHERRY
How would you know?

RON MACLEAN
Fair comment. I've never seen you with Jack Layton in his underwear.

DON CHERRY
I'm not sure this conversation is heading in the right direction.

RON MACLEAN
What's your prediction for the Federal Election?

DON CHERRY
Over 2 million people voted in the advance poll. I think a lot more will vote on May 2.

RON MACLEAN
That seems pretty safe. Who do you think will form the government?

DON CHERRY
The Governor-General. It's her call.

RON MACLEAN
Don, I hate to break it to you, but there's been a change in the G-G.

DON CHERRY
Oh, yeah, that's right. Now we've got a constitutional lawyer who played hockey for Harvard.

RON MACLEAN
You don't seem enthusiastic.

DON CHERRY
I know I'll get shot for saying this but I'm more enthusiastic about cute babes from Haiti.

RON MACLEAN
You won't get shot, but you might get fired.

DON CHERRY
They can't fire me, there'd be a revolt.

RON MACLEAN
So that's it from us here at House of Commons Night in Canada...

DON CHERRY
I'm trying to imagine the headlines..."Grapes shot at dawn. Refuses blindfold."

RON MACLEAN
Maybe they'd just shoot you with Laura Secord chocolates.

DON CHERRY
Worse than blood stains.

RON MACLEAN
On your suits nobody will notice.

The F35 Edsel

Statement by the Prime Minister of Lockheed-Martin


Canada needs this aircraft for adequate force projection from our seat at the table in the global alliance against environment-rich situational awareness and extremist terrorism. Canadians who think otherwise have the luxury of living in a democracy where futile parliamentary bickering is protected by strong patriotic citizens prepared to do tough, dirty work with no thanks. We had to bomb Libya with antique F-18s: who wants that stain on Canadian history?

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

The Case of the Booted Guerilla (Found?)

Greenslade:
Listeners, does it strike you as at all significant that in a story that concerns a gorilla that wears boots, Eccles is bare footed? Could it be that these clues will bare feet?

Afghanistan: Hundreds escape from Kandahar prison
"A tunnel hundreds of metres long was dug from the south of the prison into the prison and 476 political prisoners escaped last night," said prison director General Ghulam Dastageer Mayar.

One escapee told the BBC it had taken him about 30 minutes to walk the length of the tunnel. The escape took most of the night and vehicles were waiting at the exit point to take prisoners away.

Kandahar's provincial authorities said a search operation was under way.

So far, only about a dozen of the prisoners have been recaptured. Police said they were looking for men without shoes - many escaped barefoot.

The Black Hole of ISAF

ISAF Joint Command Morning Operational Update, April 26, 2011





ISAF Joint Command Evening Operational Update April 27, 2011

ISAF Joint Command - Afghanistan
2011-04-S-084
For Immediate Release

KABUL, Afghanistan (April 27, 2011) – Afghan National Security and International Security Assistance Forces discovered 2,502 pounds (1,135 kilograms) of hashish during a patrol in Zharay district, Kandahar province, today.

The drugs were destroyed by security forces.

In other ISAF news through Afghanistan:

South

An Afghan and coalition forces patrol discovered a weapons cache in Kandahar district, Kandahar province, today, consisting of three AK-47s, nine magazines with rounds, 400-800 loose 7.62 mm rounds, two 40 mm rounds and one large bag of an unknown substance.

Also in Kandahar province, Spin Boldak district, coalition forces found 37 pressure plates, five suicide vests, three battery packs and three strips of plastic foam.

East

A coalition forces patrol discovered 10 82 mm rounds in Ahmadabad district, Paktiya province, today.

All weapons have been or will be destroyed by security forces.

Tunnel? Sarpoza?