Friday, July 17, 2015

Wordfuck and Terrorism


 “wordfuck” n.

Definition:  the use of a word to cause confusion rather than clarity.
A recent flagrant example:  Obama's use of the word "imminent"

Orwell was all over this, but the use of "Orwellian" has itself been wordfucked by having its use vague, which is convenient for the user.  Better to read his own words:

"But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.
***
"What is above all needed is to let the meaning choose the word, and not the other way about. In prose, the worst thing one can do with words is to surrender them. When you think of a concrete object, you think wordlessly, and then, if you want to describe the thing you have been visualizing, you probably hunt about till you find the exact words that seem to fit it. When you think of something abstract you are more inclined to use words from the start, and unless you make a conscious effort to prevent it, the existing dialect will come rushing in and do the job for you, at the expense of blurring or even changing your meaning. Probably it is better to put off using words as long as possible and get one’s meaning as clear as one can through pictures or sensations. Afterwards one can choose — not simply ACCEPT— the phrases that will best cover the meaning, and then switch round and decide what impressions one’s words are likely to make on another person. This last effort of the mind cuts out all stale or mixed images, all prefabricated phrases, needless repetitions, and humbug and vagueness generally. But one can often be in doubt about the effect of a word or a phrase, and one needs rules that one can rely on when instinct fails. I think the following rules will cover most cases:

(i) Never use a metaphor, simile or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.

(ii) Never use a long word where a short one will do.

(iii) If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.

(iv) Never use the passive where you can use the active.

(v) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.

(vi) Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous."
***
At the end of the Second World War, the United States Department of War became the Department of Defense.  It's been downhill from there.

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

SWAMP - a new demographic

Saxon White Anglo Male Protestant













...which is becoming extinct, but not without a lot of thrashing around, risking detonation of the entire world:  Dawkins, Hitchens, ...it goes on.

How did this happen?

The essential attribute is lack of insight.  The inability to distinguish between a dispassionate interest in the truth and gonadal/brain-stem reasoning cloaked with pseudo-rational "thinking" is the hallmark of the species.

Issac Newton spent his later career studying alchemy.  We can all do this.  An interest in the truth , however defined, is what separates the crows from the goats.

Saturday, July 4, 2015

July 4th Ultraviolet Terrorism Alert

Just because you can't see it doesn't mean you won't get burned.



If nothing happens it's because we protected you even though our resources are stretched beyond capacity.

If something horrible happens it's because we don't have enough resources or power and/or have crippling civilian oversight.

Don't say you weren't warned.

Friday, July 3, 2015

Mispeaking and Mistruthing


















Published: March 18, 2013, 4:57 pm
OTTAWA — Alberta Premier Alison Redford says the federal government should follow her province’s lead of introducing a carbon price on greenhouse gas emissions for large industrial emitters — as long as it improves environmental outcomes and is not a publicity stunt.

In an interview Monday with Postmedia News, Redford also said the Obama administration’s looming decision over the Keystone XL oilsands pipeline will have long-term implications on the Canada-U.S. relationship.

She also scolded federal NDP leader Tom Mulcair for spreading what she said are “mistruths” and betraying Canada’s long-term economic interests during his visit last week to the United States.
But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation, even among people who should and do know better.
George Orwell
Politics and the English Language

"I mis-spoke."
What the hell does that mean?  I didn't know what I was talking about?  I thought it was right but it wasn't?  I just made it up and didn't care if it was right or not?  I knew it wasn't right but said it anyway?

Here's a suggestion;  let's encourage the use of "accurate" and "inaccurate."

For example:  "Premier Redford was unable to say which statement of Mr. Mulcair's was inaccurate or how it was inaccurate."

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Canada Day 2015







I'm not a citizen of NATO...

...so fuck off.


July 1, 2015

My fellow Canadians,

Whatever your political views, I think it's obvious that we're all in this together:  we're all Canadian citizens,

Declaration of Independence from NATO

We hold these truths to be stone-cold obvious:

1. We are not NATO citizens.

2. NATO is a military alliance from which we can withdraw at any time, giving six months notice.

3. As the International Committee of the Red Cross has said, international agreements, such as the Geneva Conventions, are made between and among nation states.

4. Some international agreements - such as the Statute of Rome that Canada has signed - provide for international law taking precedence over national law where grave breaches of international humanitarian law ("war crimes") are concerned.

5. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled - unanimously - that Canada's international human rights obligations are binding [2008 SCC 28]

6. The idea that our obligations to NATO take precedence over our international human rights obligations is preposterous.

7. The idea that our obligations to NATO take precedence over Canadian law - and in particular, the Criminal Code of Canada - is equally preposterous.

8.  The idea that our obligations to NATO take precedence over our own foreign policy is even more preposterous.

9. The idea that our obligations to NATO require us to collude in war crimes is just stupid.

Happy Canada Day, everybody.

PS;  Dear Google, your Canada Day artwork of two people canoeing is also preposterous.  The canoe doesn't look like a canoe, and the paddlers seem not to know the difference.




Monday, June 29, 2015

The revolving door to McDonalds...


....where the Political Elite go to work if they can't get jobs at the Tony Blair Faith Foundation.





Much has been made of the revolving doors in Washington, where important regulatory jobs with the executive branch (sheepdogs) are regularly given to those who are being regulated (wolves).  The sheep are the raw material that keeps both groups in highly paid employment but are otherwise of no consequence.

Prominent examples are listed by The Intercept.

Plus there's my personal favourite, Anne-Marie Slaughter, who has been an Ivy League/Oxbridge shill for McDonald's.